Last Day to Sign Up | April 7th, 2025 |
Last Day to Complete Mentorship Sessions | May 23rd, 2025 |
Posters Due If we don't see your poster by 5pm May 30th, we'll email you to ask if you're still participating. |
May 30th, 2025 |
Reception & Celebration | June 6th, 2025 @ 5:30-7:30p |
Criteria |
Expert (5) |
Intermediate (3-4) |
Emerging (1-2) |
Novice (0) |
Research Topic & Content |
A well-formulated research topic is present and easily identifiable, along with relevant findings and analysis. |
Research topic, findings, and analysis are present. |
Research topic, findings and analysis are present, but need some work. |
Topic needs refining. |
Structure & Flow |
Information is well-structured and flows well. |
Structure and flow of information is somewhat intuitive. |
Structure and flow of information is not intuitive, but could be improved with minor changes. |
Structure and flow of information needs improvement. |
Credible Sources |
Sources are diverse in type and support the topic; strong skill in locating and identifying credible sources. |
Majority of sources are diverse and support topic. |
Some sources support topic; adding another source or two could improve small gaps. |
Source selection can be improved. |
Works Cited |
Citations are provided, and are correctly done. |
Citations are provided, and are mostly correct. |
Citations are provided, but need work. |
No citations presented. |
The Emerging Scholar Prize is judged before the reception. Judges include faculty from different divisions across campus. Librarian mentors do not judge this category.
The Librarian's Prize is determined by nomination and is based on exhibiting a growth mindset during the research mentorship process.
Criteria |
Expert (5) |
Intermediate (3-4) |
Emerging (1-2) |
Novice (0) |
Relevance to the Community |
Strong, clear connection to a well-defined community issue; thoroughly researched & community-centered. |
Topic is relevant and moderately connected to a community issue. |
Some relevance to the community; connection could be stronger. |
Minimal or unclear connection to community concerns. |
Community Involvement |
Active, meaningful partnerships with, or input from, community members and/or organizations. |
Some engagement with local stakeholders or minor collaboration. |
Limited engagement; mostly one-directional or informal. |
No evidence of community involvement. |
Accessibility & Communication |
Research is clear, jargon-free, and visually or verbally accessible to all audiences. |
Mostly clear and understandable; some technical language used. |
Generally understandable but lacks clarity or engaging presentation. |
Difficult to understand; poor communication or presentation. |
Educational Value & Student Involvement |
Strong student leadership and learning; inclusive approach to the research. |
Good student involvement and demonstration of learning. |
Moderate student role or unclear learning outcomes. |
Limited student involvement or educational value. |
The Community Engagement Prize is judged before the reception. Judges include faculty from different divisions across campus. Librarian mentors do not judge this category.
Criteria |
Expert (5) |
Intermediate (3-4) |
Emerging (1-2) |
Novice (0) |
Audience Interaction |
Commands audience’s interest during interaction; is responsive and enthusiastic about topic. |
Maintains audience’s interest during interaction; is responsive and enthusiastic about topic. |
Attempts to maintain audience’s interest during interaction; is responsive about topic. |
Little to no interaction with audience. |
Discussion of Topic |
Students articulate their research with both confidence and demonstration of deep knowledge of topic. |
Student is confident and/or shows ability to talk about their research. |
Student demonstrates some grasp of the topic when asked questions. |
Student attempts to articulate their research. |
Creativity & Innovation |
Highly original or inventive approach to presenting research. |
Some creative or unique aspects present. |
Few creative elements. |
Little to no innovation or creativity. |
Visual Communication |
All content is logically and concisely displayed; text and figures are readable and relevant to the topic. |
Most content is logically and concisely displayed; text and figures are readable and relevant to the topic. |
Some content is logically and concisely displayed; text and figures are readable and somewhat relevant to the topic. |
Arrangement and/or choice of content is confusing and hard to follow. |
The Audience Engagement Prize is judged live at the reception and only presenters who stand by their posters and talk about their work are eligible.